1000 TIT BITS ON DISCIPLINE -247
971. ‘Extraneous materials collected behind the back of the delinquent used by the inquiry officer for arriving at the guilt, proceedings vitiated.’
[P. Munuswamy V Supdt of Police ATR 1986 (2) CAT 590 (Madras)]
972. “Disciplinary Authority cannot disagree with the findings of the inquiry officer without evaluating the evidence and without giving reasons.”
[OM. Prakash & ORS V UOI & anr (1988) 7 ATC 755 (New Delhi)]
973. ‘It is obligatory to furnish copy of inquiry report and afford opportunity before taking action against the delinquent’.
[Premnath K. Sharma V UOI (1988) 6 ATC 904 (Bombay)].
974. ‘Appointment of inquiry officer before the receipt of explanation from the delinquent indicates closed mind’.
[Nusrath Akbar Khan V Joint Controller of Imports & Exports 1987 4 ATC 628 (Bangalore)]
975. ‘Unexplained delay in initiating inquiry a ground for quashing the proceedings’.
[E. Vedavyas V Govt of AP 1989 (11) ATC 257 (Hyderabad): 1990(1) SLJ (CAT) 173]
Post a Comment