1000 TIT BITS ON DISCIPLINE -235
911. “The opinion of the hand writing expert is seldom conclusive and no importance can be attached to it when there is overwhelming evidence to the contrary.”
[(1954) 2 MLJ 39 (Cap) ILR 1955 MYS 585; 39 Cuttack LT 39 Rule 14(23)]
912. “IO had held the charges proved without discussing the evidence finding of the IO vitiated”
[1991(1) ATJ 245]
913. Departmental proceedings to be stayed when criminal and departmental proceedings relate to the same charges and supported by the same material.
[Guman Singh V UOI OA No. 148 of 1993 CAT ND Bench DOJ 22-07-1993].
[M.L.Sahansar V UOI (1991) 18 ATC 586 (Delhi) DOJ 28 09 1990]
914. Putting incriminating questions by the IO amounts to denial of reasonable opportunities and is indicative of Bias on his part.
[G. Selavathy V Director of Social Welfare Department Govt. of Pondicherry (1991) 18 ATC 33 (Madras) DOJ 04-12-1989]
915. Not necessary for the Inquiry officer to forward request of delinquent for legal assistance to the Disciplinary Authority for decision.
[IIT V UOI 1991 (17) ATC 352:1991 Supp(2) SCC 12; 1991 SCC (L&S) 1137 (S.C) DOJ 05 02 1991]
Post a Comment