Staff Rulings – 243. MACP -16
76. Why was the structured promotion scheme for Staff Car Drivers retained instead of switching over to MACPS?
he existing structured promotion scheme for drivers was considered more beneficial to this category of staff, and the Postal Federations requested its retention.
DG (P) No. 4-7 (MACP)/2009-PCC dated 18.09.2009.
77. What action was mandatory for administrations regarding pending TBOP/BCR placements before placing staff under MACPS?
Action had to be taken to finalise all TBOP/BCR placements due for the period up to 31-08-2008 by conducting meetings of the Screening Committee and issuing orders.
DG (P) No. 4-7 (MACP)/2009-PCC dated 18.09.2009.
78. In the Department of Posts, before whom must the recommendations of the Screening Committee be placed for final approval?
They must be placed before the Director Postal Service / Director Accounts Postal / Head of the Region / Circle or Competent Authority for approval.
DG (P) No. 4-7 (MACP)/2009-PCC dated 18.09.2009.
79. What amendment was made regarding the 3rd MACP entitlement for officials in the Grade Pay of Rs. 2800?
It was amended to clarify that the 3rd MACP to the Grade Pay of Rs. 4200/- is admissible on completion of 10 years of service in the Grade Pay of Rs. 2800 or 30 years of service, whichever is earlier.
DG (P) No. 4-7 (MACP)/2009-PCC dated 20.05.2010.
80. Who is competent to act as Chairperson of the Screening Committee in the Department of Posts if a Senior Time Scale (STS) officer is unavailable?
An officer holding a post in the Junior Time Scale (JTS) with a grade pay of Rs. 5400/- in PB-2 can act as the Chairperson.
DG (P) No. 45/6/2008-P&PW (F) dated 09.12.2009.
Post a Comment