1000 TIT BITS ON DISCIPLINE -246
966. ‘In a departmental inquiry in the absence of impeachable documentary evidence to support adverse inference as to the finding of guilt against the delinquent, it is a case of no evidence.”
[Padmanav Arukh V UOI ATR 1987 (1) CAT 129 (Cuttack)].
967. ‘Non supply of inquiry report before imposing punishment when the Disciplinary Authority and inquiring authority are different violates rules’.
[V. Shanmugam V UOI ATR 1986(2) CAT 226 (Madras)]
968. ‘Non furnishing of report of inquiry officer to the delinquent vitiates penalty order’.
[T.A. Pawadai V UOI & ORS (1988) 8 ATC 297 (Ahmedabad)]
969. ‘Confessional statement of a person not examined or cross examined at the inquiry but relied on by the inquiry officer vitiates the proceedings’.
[Binary Paul V UOI ATR 1986 CAT 446 (Calcutta)].
970. ‘Searching cross examination of the delinquent by the inquiry authority is in violation of principle of natural justice’.
[Perumbaboo V UOI ATR 1987 (2) CAT 13 (Delhi): (1987) 4 ATC 727]
Post a Comment