1000 TIT BITS ON DISCIPLINE -107
396. No charge sheet within 6 months the suspension is illegal
Suspension in contemplation disciplinary proceedings for more than 6 months without issue of charge sheet illegal.
[Mohinder Singh V UOI & others OA No. 676 of 1992 CAT Bombay Bench DOJ 21.09.1992]
397. Continued suspension for long without review; not valid.
[N. Arumugam V UOI OA No.113 of 992 CAT Madras Bench DOJ 11.06.1993]
398. Revocation of suspension after long time without initiation of disciplinary proceedings entails payment of full salary for the period of suspension.
[Mohan Raj Sundaram V UOI OA No. 426 of 1992 CAT Madras Bench DOJ 16.09.1992]
399. ‘Prolonging suspension over a year without initiating disciplinary proceedings illegal’.
[P. Satya Harnath V Collector of customs & ORS (1988) 7 ATC 548 (Madras Bench)]
400. Suspension during investigation by Police, is legal
[B.R. Saini V. Chandigarh administration 1987(1) SLJ (CAT) 150 (Chandigarh Bench) ATR 1987 (1) CAT 30]
401. ‘Mere suspension cannot be the basis for compulsory retirement’.
[Rabindranath De V UOI & ORS ATR (1988) (1) CAT 55 (Calcutta Bench)]
402. Ratification by competent authority cannot validate suspension order passed without jurisdiction
[R.K Misra V UOI & ORS (1991) 16 ATC 426 (New Delhi) DOJ 13.11.1990]
403. “Continued suspension over 18 months without filing charge sheet – unjustified”
[A. Palanisamy & ORS V UOI & ORS (1991) 16 ATC (Madras) DOJ 12.10.1990]
404. “Order reducing subsistence allowance to be supported by reasons and can be passed only after notice to the suspended employee”
[S. Pandian & ORS V UOI &ORS (1991) 16 ATC 184 (Madras) DOJ 14.11.1990]
405. “Subsistence allowance cannot be reduced when prolongation of suspension not attributable to the suspended employee”
[P.L Sha V UOI & ORS 1991(1) ATJC (21) (Ahmedabad) DOJ 23.03.1990]
Post a Comment