1000 TIT BITS ON DISCIPLINE -172
736. Issue of second charge sheet on same allegations cancelling first one, where the first one has been replied to by the employee, was held to be not permissible
(Chander Sekar v. U.O.I. ATC 1990(12) P.868).
737. Inordinate and unexplained delay in initiating disciplinary proceeding – held – vitiates the enquiry
(The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Bani Singh and Another, ATR 1990 (1) SC 581)
738. Inordinate delay in commencing disciplinary proceeding causes prejudice to the charged officer and as such punishment order cannot be sustained
(P.K.Panda v. Union of India, ATC 1992 (19) P.792)
739. Unexplained delay in initiating disciplinary proceeding constitutes denial of reasonable opportunity
(K.K.Sood v. Union of India, SLJ 1989 (4) CAT P.495).
740. A charge sheet which was not accompanied by Statement of Imputation of misconduct/misbehaviour was held to be invalid
(K.N.Prakasham v. Union of India and others, ATC 1992 (20) Page 676)
Post a Comment