1000 BITS ON DISCIPLINE -165
701. Issue of second charge sheet on same allegations cancelling first one, where the first one has been replied to by the employee, was held to be not permissible
(Chander Sekar v. U.O.I. ATC 1990(12) P.868).
702. Inordinate and unexplained delay in initiating disciplinary proceeding – held – vitiates the enquiry
(The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Bani Singh and Another, ATR 1990 (1) SC 581)
703. Inordinate delay in commencing disciplinary proceeding causes prejudice to the charged officer and as such punishment order cannot be sustained
(P.K.Panda v. Union of India, ATC 1992 (19) P.792)
704. Unexplained delay in initiating disciplinary proceeding constitutes denial of reasonable opportunity
(K.K.Sood v. Union of India, SLJ 1989 (4) CAT P.495).
705. Delay of 8 years in holding departmental enquiry caused prejudice to the charged officer – held – punishment quashed.
(P.A.Nagarajan v. Union of India and Another ATC 1992 (19) P.707).
Post a Comment